Secure.gov sites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you have actually securely connected to the.gov site. Share sensitive details just on official, safe websites.
- About - The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Rights FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as property managers and property business along with other entities, such as towns, banks or other loaning institutions and property owners insurance coverage companies whose discriminatory practices make housing not available to individuals since of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
impairment.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department may submit suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of persons raises an issue of public significance. Where force or danger of force is utilized to deny or hinder reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice might institute criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise supplies treatments for dealing with individual problems of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have actually been victims of an illegal housing practice, may file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of people based on recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the central goals of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers try to camouflage their discrimination by providing false information about availability of housing, either stating that nothing was readily available or guiding homeseekers to specific locations based on race. Individuals who get such false information or misdirection may have no understanding that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought lots of cases alleging this kind of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to discover this kind of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage financing cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually also alleged that towns and other city government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they denied authorizations or zoning modifications for housing developments, or relegated them to predominantly minority neighborhoods, because the potential locals were anticipated to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religious beliefs. This restriction covers instances of obvious discrimination against members of a specific faith as well less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances created to limit making use of private homes as a locations of worship. The number of cases submitted considering that 1968 declaring religious discrimination is small in contrast to a few of the other prohibited bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does consist of a minimal exception that permits non-commercial housing operated by a religious company to reserve such housing to individuals of the exact same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, especially those who are poor, and with minimal housing alternatives, frequently have little recourse however to endure the humiliation and deterioration of sexual harassment or danger having their families and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on proprietors who develop an untenable living environment by demanding sexual favors from occupants or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to obtain relief for occupants who have been treated unfairly by a proprietor because of sex and likewise deter other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage financing may also adversely impact females, especially minority women. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of a person's birth or where his/her forefathers come from. Census data show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our country's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus community federal governments that have tried to decrease or limit the variety of Hispanic households that might reside in their neighborhoods. We have sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have imposed more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has actually likewise taken legal action against lending institutions for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other areas of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have actually taken action against private proprietors who have actually victimized such people.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing against families with children under 18. In addition to prohibiting an outright rejection of housing to households with kids, the Act also avoids housing service providers from imposing any special requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of kids. For instance, landlords might not locate families with kids in any single part of a complex, position an unreasonable restriction on the overall number of individuals who may reside in a dwelling, or limit their access to leisure services provided to other renters. In most circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act restricts a housing company from declining to rent or offer to households with kids. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which fulfills the requirements stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published policies and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act defines persons with a disability to mean those individuals with psychological or physical disabilities that substantially limit several significant life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment might include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, mobility disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic fatigue, discovering impairment, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity may include seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, performing manual tasks, looking after one's self, finding out, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also safeguards persons who have a record of such an impairment, or are considered as having such an impairment. Current users of unlawful illegal drugs, individuals convicted for illegal manufacture or circulation of a regulated compound, sex transgressors, and juvenile transgressors are ruled out disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no securities to people with or without impairments who present a direct risk to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone presents such a direct risk should be made on a personalized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for individuals with disabilities has focused on two significant locations. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other regulations worrying land use are not employed to hinder the property choices of these individuals, consisting of needlessly limiting common, or congregate, property plans, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that freshly built multifamily housing is developed in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's availability requirements so that it is available to and usable by people with impairments, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination against individuals with disabilities, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with disabilities may live together in congregate living plans, frequently referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other city government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or executing land usage policies that leave out or otherwise discriminate versus people with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To utilize land use policies or actions that deal with groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for individuals with disabilities or a specific kind of special needs, such as psychological illness, from finding in a particular area, while allowing other groups of unassociated people to live together because location.
- To act versus, or deny a license, for a home because of the impairment of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building license for a home since it was meant to provide housing for persons with mental retardation.
- To decline to clear up accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings may be required to pay for individuals or groups of persons with disabilities an equivalent chance to use and take pleasure in housing. What constitutes an affordable lodging is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are reasonable. If a requested adjustment enforces an excessive monetary or administrative burden on a local federal government, or if an adjustment produces a fundamental change in a regional federal government's land usage and zoning plan, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus persons with disabilities to include a failure "to create and construct" specific new multi-family houses so that they are accessible to and usable by individuals with specials needs, and particularly individuals who use wheelchairs. The Act requires all recently built multi-family residences of 4 or more systems meant for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular features: an accessible entryway on an accessible path, available typical and public usage areas, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each home, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can steer about the area.
Developers, home builders, owners, and designers responsible for the style or construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held accountable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures stop working to meet these style requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought many enforcement actions versus those who stopped working to do so. Most of the cases have been resolved by consent decrees providing a variety of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- options (monetary funds or other building and construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing units accessible; training on the accessibility requirements for those involved in the construction process; a required that all brand-new housing jobs adhere to the ease of access requirements, and monetary relief for those hurt by the violations. In addition, the Department has sought to promote accessibility through building regulations.
